Showing posts sorted by relevance for query C-484. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query C-484. Sort by date Show all posts

Wednesday, July 02, 2008

Ken Epp's mask slips

The sponsor of Bill C-484 says his "Unborn Victims of Crime Act" has nothing to do with abortion. Nope. Nothing at all. No, siree. Inserting the notion of the personhood of the unborn into a piece of criminal law won't affect abortion rights. C-484 is a legislative island, entire of itself.

Uh-huh.

And here is Ken Epp on yesterday's long-overdue honouring of Dr. Henry Morgentaler:

...Tory MP Ken Epp (Edmonton-Sherwood Park) said the pro-choice supporters have "gone too far."

"As far as I'm concerned it is indeed controversial," said Epp, who has a private member's bill before the House of Commons that would allow criminal charges to be laid in the death or injury of an unborn child when the child's mother is the victim of a crime.

Epp also questioned the objectivity of Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin as head of the Order of Canada advisory council. "Is she now totally out of impartiality because of the fact she has weighed into this? I am concerned about all of those things," he said.

I enjoy the melodious sound of right-wing teeth-gnashing as much as anyone, and there's quite a symphony going on today. Rock on! But if anyone still thinks that Epp's Bill has nothing to do with abortion, guess again. And if you guess wrong, I have a wonderful old bridge to sell you.

Friday, February 29, 2008

Your government is being run by Christian Dominionists



Yeah. Thanks for taking the shroud off the agenda. Christian dominionist, Charles McVety, is taking full credit for a change in the Income Tax Act which allows the federal government to censor anything McVety finds doesn't meet his Christian zombie brigade agenda.
A well-known evangelical crusader is claiming credit for the federal government's move to deny tax credits to TV and film productions that contain graphic sex and violence or other offensive content.

Charles McVety, president of the Canada Family Action Coalition, said his lobbying efforts included discussions with Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day and Justice Minister Rob Nicholson, and "numerous" meetings with officials in the Prime Minister's Office.

This slimy piece of work is exactly what the Harper government is all about. In January 2006, just before election day, I wrote this about Harper and the coalition of Christian right-wing freaks that had gathered around him.
Harper gathers support, either through candidates or directly, from groups which will expect their social issues to receive priority on any Conservative government order paper. Vote Marriage Canada, The Promise Keepers, Focus On The Family Canada, R.E.A.L. Women of Canada, Canada Family Action Coalition and Campaign Life Coalition are some of the groups which support the Harper campaign by either promoting their candidate or openly supporting the Conservative Party of Canada platform. All of these groups are homophobic, most are anti-abortion and most pursue an extreme right-wing christian agenda. While some claim to be non-partisan, that suggestion is quickly dispatched with one look at their election literature. Many of these groups are Canadian branches of larger US bodies led by proselytizing christian extremists.

[...]

As much as Harper preaches "less government" he only means it in terms of taxation and delivery of programs. When it comes to social governance, a Conservative government would be in your face, in your bedroom and likely listening to your phone calls.

At the time several readers responded suggesting I was overstating the situation and being deliberately hyperbolic.

So, tell me which part of that prediction isn't now coming true?

After Harper's narrow minority victory in 2006, McVety was one of the first people invited to the Prime Minister's office. In September 2006, Marci McDonald wrote the cover story for The Walrus providing a glimpse of how ingrained the Christian dominionists had become in the Harper government. She too, was largely dismissed as exaggerating the problem even though we now knew what McVety was all about.

During the last election, as head of a handful of pro-family lobbies including the Defend Marriage Coalition, McVety emerged as a power to be reckoned with. He bought up the rights to unclaimed Liberal websites such as josephvolpe.com and stacked a handful of Conservative nomination contests in favour of evangelical candidates adamantly opposed to same-sex matrimony, a campaign he has vowed to repeat. As Harper navigates the tricky waters of minority rule—keeping the lid on any eruptions of rhetorical fervour from the rambunctious theo-cons in his caucus—it is noteworthy that he has continued to cultivate a man regarded as the lightning rod of the Christian right. Last spring, those around the prime minister drafted McVety to help sell the government’s contentious child-care policy, and on budget day he was the personal guest of Finance Minister Jim Flaherty in the Commons’ vip gallery.
This latest move is intended to shut down Canadian film and television productions which don't pass the "Disney" test of McVety's living room. But worse, far worse, is the absolute fact that a rabid Christian dominionist has penetrated government and is now writing policy.

If you think McVety wasn't behind Bill C-484, think again. It's right on the front page of McVety's Family Action Coalition website.

McVety clearly has a strategy: Get the thin edge of various Christian dominionist wedges into government policy and when the time is right, drive them in as deep as possible. McVety wants a Christian evangelist theocracy and Harper is more than happy to lead it for him. Anything for power.

And while McVety is proudly taking credit for his attack on Canadian freedoms via the Income Tax Act, there is this whiny little line off his group's website:

(NOTE: Due to CFAC's political actions to support family, religious freedom and democracy, Revenue Canada will not allow us to issue charitable tax receipts.)
Take note of the attempt to portray themselves as "persecuted". If Harper ever gets a majority, you can expect that McVety's groups, hardly beacons of freedom and democracy, will find a way to further amend the Income Tax Act to make themselves tax-exempt.

This isn't just dangerous. This is very dangerous. Bill C-10 should never have gotten out of committee. It is up to the opposition, the majority in Parliament and on parliamentary committees, to be aware that Harper is serving the Christian dominionist agenda. It's time they get off their asses and stop the creep towards a theocracy.

No more playing hooky from committee meetings, no more missing votes. Read every line of every piece of proposed legislation and do the required research. Do otherwise and we'll be in the same condition as the train-wreck that rests against our southern border.

Cross posted from The Galloping Beaver

Saturday, November 08, 2008

Countdown to ConCon

The Conservative policy convention will officially begin in Winnipeg next week, but the resolutions books are out and lively discussions have already started.

The base gets one kick at the cat every three years, and the poor feline in question would appear to be a candidate for rescue by the Humane Society even in advance of the actual debates. The resolutions are a Christmas wish-list for far-right conservatives. Nothing hidden about this agenda, helpfully compiled by Kady O'Malley.

Back into the trenches of the culture wars we go: another stab at C-484 , no more Section 13 investigations by the Canadian Human Rights Commission, no more equal pay for work of equal value, cutting back student loans and payback flexibility (while making loans available to kids with wealthy parents), deleting any mention of childcare from the Conservative policy book, "three strikes and yer out" legislation that's been working so well in the States, and a brave stand against the onslaught of polygamy.

Canadians will be encouraged to adopt Canadian common values (equality, democracy and the rule of law). While this is clearly aimed at new immigrants, I find myself wondering about the Conservatives' own commitment to equality (e.g., equal pay for work of equal value, gay rights, etc.) and democracy (e.g., electoral reform, government transparency). Are we being governed by un-Canadians? Not much question about the rule of law, though: it's all crackdowns and punishment, all the time.

Not that it's unremitting doom and gloom. Resolution P-204 calls for openness and transparency in matters of government spending. (Good luck with that.) Resolution P-205 seeks enhanced Arctic sovereignty and devolution. Resolution P-222 supports
employment standards protection for temporary foreign workers.

And the very first proposed amendment in the consolidated resolutions book calls for government to "ensure...the safety of our citizens at home and abroad." Is this a reference, perchance, to Brenda Martin? Or does it spell good news for Abousfian Abdelrazik, Omar Khadr, Bashir Makhtal
and other marooned brown citizens? Too bad that this resolution, if it passes, won't be binding on a government that hasn't lifted a finger to help those people so far, and indeed has hindered their return.

Policy conventions are where ideology fetches up on the shoals of pragmatism. Harper grabbed his second mandate by being all sweater-y and moderate. He's not about to be swayed by much of the backlash stuff, at least until his Long March to a majority is complete. But we do get here, I suspect, more than a glimpse of the Conservative maximum program. The debates should be fascinating. I can't wait.